Researchers analysed 1,825 scientific publications from the period 1969 to June 2026.
The field now ranges from biomechanics and exercise physiology to injury prevention, rehabilitation and performance optimisation.
Where are the research gaps?
[bild id="XX"]
Such analyses show not only what has already been studied well. They also reveal areas where data are lacking.
Para Swimming, Masters swimming and standardised return-to-sport procedures are among the topics that could be investigated more extensively in the future.
Research priorities are changing
In the early decades of swimming research, fundamental physiological questions were often the main focus. As technology developed, detailed biomechanical analyses, video methods and later digital measurement systems were added.
Today, swimming performance is increasingly viewed from an interdisciplinary perspective. Medicine, training science, biomechanics, data analysis and rehabilitation interact with one another.
That opens up new possibilities, but it also increases the demands on coaches. Not every published metric can be translated directly into a training decision.
Translating research into practice correctly
A single study should rarely be enough to completely change an established training system. More important questions are whether the findings have been replicated, how large the sample was and whether the athletes studied are comparable with one's own training group.
In swimming in particular, samples are often small because studies with high-performance athletes are difficult to organise. That does not mean such studies are worthless, but their limitations should be taken into account.
A platform such as schwimmtrainer.at can play an important role here: not merely reproducing research, but placing it in the context of day-to-day coaching.
SCIENTIFIC SOURCE
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42657427/